You have successfully logged out.

Hello !
Logout

Atraumatic Needles for Spinal Anesthesia

Choose Pencan® – because needle design matters.

Spinal anesthesia is widely used, yet 5–8% of attempts fail1, often requiring conversion to general anesthesia—causing delays, discomfort, and higher complication risks like post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).
Discover how needle design impacts spinal anesthesia success.2
Learn why atraumatic Pencan® needles reduce PDPH risk and improve patient safety.​

Spinal Anesthesia

Failure Rate

  • up to

    0%

Close-up comparison of a sharp medical needle puncturing skin on the left and a small healed puncture mark on the right, both shown against a light skin-toned background

Pencan® - atraumatic needle:

Advanced technology for decreasing incidence of post lumbar puncture headaches.

Close-up comparison showing a beveled medical needle tip on the left and a small puncture mark on skin on the right, both against a light skin-toned background

Quincke - cutting needle:

One risk factor for post lumbar puncture headaches is the use of Quincke needle.

Illustration comparing Pencan, Sprotte, and Whitacre spinal needles with labeled tip designs and measurements in millimeters
A spinal needle tip positioned near tissue layers, showing anatomical structures in cross-section with colored regions for muscle, dura, and nerve bundle

Fig.1

Two spinal needle tips positioned near tissue layers, with the lower needle highlighted in red close to a nerve bundle

Fig.2

Why choose Pencan® as your atraumatic needle?

Related Documents

  • WHO recommendations

    Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience - WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience

    link

  • WFSA Labour Analgesia Declaration

    Labour Analgesia Declaration – WFSA

    link

  • ASA Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia

    An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Anesthesiology

    link

  • ASA Statement on Neuraxial Analgesia or Anesthesia in Obstetrics

    Standards and Practice Parameters Statement on Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetrics

    link

Get in touch with our experts

Thank you for your interest

check_circle

A responsible contact person will get in touch with you as soon as possible.

Your request could not be submitted. Please try again.

warning
A mother lies in the operating room after a  caesarean section and looks at her newborn baby,  which a nurse is showing her. She looks exhausted,  but also relieved. She is wearing a surgical cap over  her dark hair, the newborn is wrapped in a white  cloth and is wearing a light blue cap.

Pain relief for C-section patients

Patients undergoing a caesarean section are particularly vulnerable, as all medications can affect the mother and child. International guidelines give helpful recommendations for pain management.
Discover our products

References

1. Kinsella, S.M. (2008). A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections. Anaesthesia, 63(8), 822–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05499.x.

2. Batova, R., & Georgiev, S. (2019). Impact of spinal needle design and approach on postdural puncture headache and spinal anesthesia failure in obstetrics. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 51(2), 77–82. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.86166.

3. Nath, S., Koziarz, A., Badhiwala, J. H., et al. (2018). Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 391(10126), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30493-6

4. Xu H, Liu Y, Song W, Kan S, Liu F, Zhang D, Ning G, Feng S. Comparison of cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia regarding postdural puncture headache: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(14):e6527. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006527. PMID: 28383416; PMCID: PMC5411200.

5. Reina, M. A., Puigdellívol-Sánchez, A., Gatt, S. P., De Andrés, J. A., Prats-Galino, A., & van Zundert, A. (2017). Electron microscopy of dural and arachnoid disruptions after subarachnoid block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 42(6), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000667

6. B. Braun technical data report, 2025

7. Reina, M. A., López, A., De Andrés, J. A., Prats-Galino, A., & van Zundert, A. (2007). Variability in the design of spinal needles: Implications for clinical practice. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 32(4), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.02.006

8. Rae, J. D., & Fettes, P. D. W. (2023). Mechanisms and management of failed spinal anesthesia. NYSORA – The New York School of Regional Anesthesia. Retrieved from https://www.nysora.com/topics/complications/mechanisms-management-failed-spinal-anesthesia/

9. Reina MA, De Andres JA, Hernández JM, Arriazu Navarro R, Pastor J, Prats-Galino A. Looking for the development of paresthesias in the subarachnoid and epidural anesthesia: A clinical and anatomical analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(Suppl):E17–E22. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182030648.