You have successfully logged out.

Hello !
Logout

Solutions beyond fusion

AESCULAP® Ennovate® Cervical

Together with surgeons we worked on the improvement of instruments and surgical techniques: The Ennovate® Cervical system offers surgeons the possibility to achieve optimal surgical outcomes in the occipital, atlantoaxial, subaxial and upper thoracic region.

Ennovate® Cervical MIS – Minimal intervention. Enhanced protection.

Portrait of Ralph Kothe

“With Ennovate® Cervical I have the full range of possibilities for solving complex situations I face in the operating room – It is a truly future-oriented system taking advanced minimally invasive approaches into account.”

Ralph Kothe, MD, Associate Professor, Head of Spine Department, Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbeck, Germany

Friction fit

Holds the polyaxial screw head in place to facilitate rod insertion.

/

EnnoCore

Optimized bone puchase for enhanced pull-out strenght through a harmonized drill and screw design.

/

Canulation

All standard screws are canulated, offering the possibility to work with K-wires.

/

Rod compatibility

All screws accept both ⌀3.5 mm an ⌀4.0 mm rods for improved intraoperative flexibility and less inventory.

/

High screw angulation

Standard polyaxial screws offer 45° in all directions. Additionally, favored angle screws offer 55° in the cranial and caudal plane.

/

EnnoTip

Specially designed tip for deeper insertion, less insertion force and reduced risk of slipping.

/

Ennovate® Cervical EnnoCore
Ennovate® Cervical EnnoTip
Ennovate® spinal navigation

References

  1. Kim D-Y, Lee S-H, Chung SK, Lee H-Y. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(1):123-9.
  2. Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stüer C, Meyer B. Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery. 2006; 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS361-6; discussion ONS366-7.
  3. Lee S-H, Choi W-G, Lim S-R, Kang H-Y, Shin S-W. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2004;4(6):644-9.
  4. Sun X-Y, Zhang X-N, Hai Y. Percutaneous versus traditional and paraspinal posterior open approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2017; 26(5):1418-31.
  5. Fong S, Duplessis S. Minimally invasive lateral mass plating in the treatment of posterior cervical trauma: surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(3):224-8.
  6. Holly LT, Foley KT. Percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(5):536-40; discussion 541.
  7. Scheufler K-M, Kirsch E. Percutaneous multilevel decompressive laminectomy, foraminotomy, and instrumented fusion for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: assessment of feasibility and surgical technique. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7(5):514-20.
  8. Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(1):E13.
  9. Wang MY, Levi ADO. Minimally invasive lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine: initial clinical experience with longterm follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(5):907-12; discussion 907-12.