You have successfully logged out.

Hello !
Logout

AV fistula catheter

Vascular access in dialysis – a sensitive, risky issue

Each dialysis patient spends up to 624 hours a year at the renal care center for their life-saving treatment. During this time, their fistula is cannulated about 300 times (assumption: three treatments per week). Every dialysis session can be particularly stressful, both for the patient but also for the nursing staff, because this complex procedure is never routine.

Needlestick injuries can happen to anyone at any time. They can be caused by patient-related factors, such as anxious or restless patients, or concealed sharps. 

300 contaminated needlestick injuries infographic Overview 300 contaminated needlestick injuries[1]

Do you want to convince yourself of the benefits of Diacan® Flex?


Request your sample
one container with with Diacan Flex needles and one container with conventional needles

Do you want to convince yourself of the benefits of Diacan® Flex?


Request your sample
diacan flex needles
Diacan Flex how to use

Do you want to convince yourself of the benefits of Diacan® Flex?

Thank you for reaching out to us!

check_circle

Kindly check your inbox and confirm the email we've sent you. We will get back to you as soon as possible.

Your request could not be submitted. Please try again.

warning

References

  1. Wittmann A, Hofmann F, Kralj N. Needle stick injuries--risk from blood contact in dialysis. J Ren Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;33(2):70-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2007.tb00043.x. PMID: 17702509.
  2. Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). Needlestick injuries. 2000. (www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/needlestick_injuries.html)
  3. Langgartner J, Audebert F, Schölmerich J, Glück T. Dengue virus infection transmitted by needle stick injury. J Infect. 2002 May;44(4):269-70. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2002.0994. PMID: 12099738.
  4. Jagger J, Hunt EH, Brand-Elnaggar J, Pearson RD. Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988 Aug 4;319(5):284-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198808043190506. PMID: 3393183.
  5. Prüss-Ustün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among healthcare workers. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Dec;48(6):482-90. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20230. PMID: 16299710.
  6. Iinuma Y, Igawa J, Takeshita M, Hashimoto Y, Fujihara N, Saito T, Takakura S, Ichiyama S. Passive safety devices are more effective at reducing needlestick injuries. J Hosp Infect. 2005 Dec;61(4):360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Sep 13. PMID: 16165248.
  7. Chalupka SM, Markkanen P, Galligan C, Quinn M. Sharps injuries and bloodborne pathogen exposures in home health care. AAOHN J. 2008 Jan;56(1):15-29; quiz 31-2. doi: 10.3928/08910162- 20080101-02. PMID: 18293597
  8. McCleary J, Caldero K, Adams T. Guarded fistula needle reduces needlestick injuries in hemodialysis. Nephrol News Issues. 2002 May;16(6):66-70, 72. PMID: 12035629.
  9. Perry J, Parker G, Jagger J. Percutaneous injuries in home healthcare settings. Home Healthc Nurse. 2001 Jun;19(6):342-4. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200106000-00005. PMID: 11985229. 
  10. Perry J, Parker G, Jagger J. EPINet Report: 2001 Percutaneous Injury Rates. Advances in exposure prevention 2003;6(3):32-36 
  11. Hatcher IB. Reducing sharps injuries among health care workers: a sharps container quality improvement project. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jul;28(7):410-4. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28041-4. PMID: 12101553;